{"id":475,"date":"2024-12-12T14:13:26","date_gmt":"2024-12-12T19:13:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/?p=475"},"modified":"2024-12-12T14:14:41","modified_gmt":"2024-12-12T19:14:41","slug":"is-winter-coming-climagination-with-jason-grillo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/2024\/12\/12\/is-winter-coming-climagination-with-jason-grillo\/","title":{"rendered":"Is Winter Coming? \u2013 Climagination with Jason Grillo"},"content":{"rendered":"

How reframing carbon removal can be a throughline to a prosperous industry<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"
Photo by Ruvim Miksanskiy: https:\/\/www.pexels.com\/photo\/aerial-photography-of-snow-covered-trees-1438761\/<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

\u201cKnowing others is intelligence; knowing yourself is true wisdom\u201d – Lao Tzu<\/span><\/em>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Writing this in December as indeed winter is upon us, I\u2019ve noticed a different kind of winter that may be coming to carbon removal: a general decline of interest in sustainability and climate among corporations who would be voluntary carbon market purchasers. In this post, I\u2019ll explore the nature of this problem, recap how corporate rollback has happened before, and offer some potential paths forward.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

First, some context. While the last 5 weeks since the US election has seen climate <\/span>scrambling to understand<\/span><\/a> what the implications of Donald Trump\u2019s victory might mean for policy, evidence has been piling up for approximately <\/span>18 months prior to that<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0 ESG hiring growth <\/span>is down<\/span><\/a> after a crescendo from 2019-2021, and very recently large corporations such as <\/span>Coca Cola<\/span><\/a> and <\/span>Goldman Sachs<\/span><\/a> are changing course on how to deliver on sustainability targets.<\/span><\/p>\n

Declining corporate sustainability budgets may constrict sales opportunities among more mainstream voluntary carbon market purchasers.Indeed, it appears that <\/span>while targets are being set,<\/span><\/a> corporations are <\/span>falling short of <\/span>resourcing <\/span><\/i>efforts<\/span><\/a> to meet those lofty goals. Additional macroeconomic changes – real or projected – such as inflation, high tariffs, or the end of <\/span>Zero Interest Rate Policy<\/span><\/a> may cause customers and investors to withdraw support.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

For a case study in how a generation of startups might grapple with this, let\u2019s consider lessons from \u201cCleantech 1.0\u201d from approximately the mid-2000s to early 2010s. In that time period, a wave of startups created a myriad of carbon-free energy solutions – for example, solar, wind, EVs, batteries, or energy efficiency software. A scarcity of patient capital, low-priced competition from abroad, particularly China, and inconsistent government tax credit support consistently challenged companies working on solutions in these sectors.<\/span><\/p>\n

The solar, wind, and battery startups were clear: they were not in the <\/span>\u201calternative energy\u201d<\/span><\/i> business, they were in the <\/span>energy<\/span><\/i> business with the all-important Levelized Cost of Electricity (LCOE) as their benchmark. Demand for clean energy persisted and grew among energy customers, particularly due to Germany\u2019s Feed-In-Tariff policy for solar, wind and geothermal. Support by Germany\u2019s leadership, and experiential learning by deploying led to solar cost declines outpacing their forecasts by decades:<\/span><\/p>\n

\"\"<\/p>\n

This enabled renewable energy companies in the early 2010s to survive – and thrive –\u00a0 during the \u2018long winter\u2019 for climate investment between 2011 and 2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

Two more examples from outside climate on the practice of business re-definition, one a failure, one a success:<\/span><\/p>\n

    \n
  1. \n
      \n
    1. \n
        \n
      1. Railroads<\/span><\/i>. In the early years of the twentieth century, railroads were a significant player in the United States\u2019 and world economy, moving huge volumes of goods and passengers. Today railroads occupy a fraction of the economy since automobiles, trucks, and air transportation of goods and people appeared on the scene, taking away significant market share such that many railroads had to declare bankruptcy. The railroads\u2019 failure: defining themselves too narrowly as <\/span>railroad<\/span><\/i> companies, not more broadly as <\/span>transportation<\/span><\/i> companies (<\/span><\/span>For more on this see Theodore Levitt, \u201cMarketing Myopia\u201d<\/a>).<\/li>\n
      2. Professional wrestling<\/span><\/i>. Yes, I watched my fair share of the spectacle on TV during my (awkward) junior high school years. What I didn\u2019t realize then was that I was witnessing a redefinition of a business that decades later has thrived and grown. How? A philosophical shift in how they defined their business: specifically, the owner of the then-World Wrestling Federation <\/span>quipped once<\/span><\/a> that they are in the \u201c<\/span>sports entertainment<\/span><\/i>\u201d business rather than the <\/span>wrestling<\/span><\/i> business – that is, oriented to the customer rather than the process of wrestling itself. Nearly forty years later, World Wrestling Entertainment had revenue of over <\/span>$1.3 billion.<\/span><\/a><\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n

        To be clear, I am NOT suggesting that CDR startups become \u2018climate entertainment\u2019 companies! However I believe that companies who are developing solutions intended primarily to help the climate struggle to define their business in a broader industrial context to that frame them well for success with future customers in the event of a climate tech \u2018winter\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n

        In short, consider the thought that <\/span>\u2018climate\u2019 is not an industry<\/span><\/i>: it\u2019s an umbrella term for technology and business innovations spanning a wide variety of industrial sectors, that happen to yield low or negative emissions.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        For many carbon removal project developers, defining along industrial lines means redefining what business they are in, and figuring out who their customer is, so they can craft a solution in a time that may be challenging in the short term. Doing so could lead to solutions that are able to penetrate existing industries with better\/faster\/cheaper products <\/span>and improve climate health as a secondary – and still very important – benefit<\/span><\/i>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        Finding a customer who can utilize the physical product or by-product of carbon removal would integrate carbon removal processes into a larger economy beyond credit sales alone. Deploying the technology for an end-use would generate customer revenue and also lead to cost improvements with experience, per <\/span>Wright\u2019s Law<\/span><\/a>.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        Internally CDR businesses should talk about themselves in terms beyond what they can do for climate. This can happen in founders meetings, with investors, with marketing partners and others who they deal with to bring their solutions to market. And in doing so develop solutions that, for example:<\/span><\/p>\n

        \u2026produce a soil amendment or improve soil health =\u00a0 \u201cwe\u2019re in the business of helping farmers deliver high quality food cheaply to consumers\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

        \u2026generate energy in rural areas = \u201cgenerating heat or electricity to places that may suffer energy scarcity\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

        \u2026combine with building materials = \u201cmake it easier for homes or roadways to be built\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

        \u2026use agricultural waste as a feedstock \u201cease the burden of disposal owners of agricultural land\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

        \u2026create gases for fuel or specialty chemicals \u201cenabling the new energy and materials economy\u201d<\/span><\/p>\n

        Carbon removal business leaders can see beyond a purely technical definition of their product, retaining personal motivations to do well for the climate while seeking commercial markets that may not have climate as top-of-mind. Key question: In the possible absence of policy interventions or without carbon credits, how would a bottom-line motivated customer buy a solution to help their own business needs?\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        What about carbon removal crediting? Offset crediting is still an option if there is sufficient interest among voluntary purchasers – this is still a relevant pathway to viability. That said, companies could decrease unit cost curves by pursuing insetting to deploy more projects, and in doing so lower their internal costs to enable creating offset credits for sale in the voluntary market.<\/span><\/p>\n

        Ultimately, compliance markets will be where carbon removal will see its greatest impact on climate, offering a dynamic quite different from motivations of voluntary carbon market customers. Redefining the business along a utilization pathway is a way of seeing a generation of carbon removal startups through to that time. Figuring out the fundamental <\/span>business<\/span><\/i> that a CDR company is pursuing could safeguard against market uncertainties as corporate sustainability interest waxes and wanes.\u00a0<\/span><\/p>\n

        Jason Grillo is a Co-Founder of AirMiners. The opinions expressed in this writing are the author\u2019s own and do not reflect the position of any employer.<\/i><\/b><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

        How reframing carbon removal can be a throughline to a prosperous industry \u201cKnowing others is intelligence; knowing yourself is true wisdom\u201d – Lao Tzu Writing this in December as indeed winter is upon us, I\u2019ve noticed a different kind of winter that may be coming to carbon removal: a general decline of interest in sustainability … <\/p>\n

        Continue reading “Is Winter Coming? \u2013 Climagination with Jason Grillo”<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,65],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-475","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-blog-post","category-climagination"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/475","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=475"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/475\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=475"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=475"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/research.american.edu\/carbonremoval\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=475"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}