Intensive Course in Gender-Sensitive Macroeconomic Modeling for Policy Analysis

Day 3: Defining and Measuring Care

Session 3.1 Meaning of Care and Nature of Care Work

Instructor: Nancy Folbre

Topics

  1. General overview of the care sector
  2. Distinctive features of care work
  3. Bargaining power and care penalties
  4. Who benefits?
  5. Critique of national income accounting 

This session focuses on conceptualizing care and care work and how care work is prone to under evaluation regardless of who performs it (although it is compounded by gender inequality). Also, how this affects the structure of wages in the paid labor market and invisibility of unpaid work. Main points covered include: 

  • General overview of the care sector. Care sector usually includes 3 industries within the service sector (health, education and social services) plus the unpaid production, development and maintenance of human capabilities in families and communities.
  • Distinctive feature of care work. Care work is a relational activity; it involves team production which makes it difficult to identify value added (e.g., many teachers during school years).
  • Bargaining power and care penalties. Commitments to care usually reduce bargaining power (because of personal attachment). There is evidence on care penalties, e.g., time devoted to time care reduces lifetime earnings, pay is less for women in care industries compared to male peers.
  • Who benefits? Employers since they don’t pay the full cost of producing labor; men because women have a larger share of care costs; the dependents cared for.
  • Critique of national income accounting. (1) GDP is misleading, e.g., care counts if performed by an outsider, but not if parents care for the children; family spending on children is considered consumption; we value inputs in health/education but not the value of the long-term outputs (2) We need to challenge conventional GDP measures as the only indicator of well-being. Satellite accounts, even though not perfect, at least are putting a quantitative measure to unpaid work, natural capital, etc. This information is the starting point to macro and micro modeling. 

Main Readings

Folbre, Nancy. “Gender and the Care Penalty,” in Oxford Handbook of Women in the Economy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2018. 

Folbre, Nancy. Developing Care: Recent Research on the Care Economy and Economic Development.2018. Available at https://idl-bnc-idrc.dspacedirect.org/handle/10625/57142 

Supplementary Readings

Chen, Xinxin, John Giles, Yafeng Wang, and Yaohui Zhao. "Gender patterns of eldercare in China." Feminist Economics 24, no. 2 (2018): 54-76.

Mugehera, Leah, and Amber Parkes. "Unlocking Sustainable Development in Africa by Addressing Unpaid Care and Domestic Work." (2020)

Addlakha, Renu. "Kinship destabilized! disability and the micropolitics of care in urban India." Current Anthropology 61, no. S21 (2020): S46-S54

Guimarães, Nadya Araujo, and Helena Hirata. "Care Work: A Latin American Perspective." In Care and Care Workers, pp. 1-24. Springer, 2021. 

Session 3.2 Accounting for Unpaid Work and Time Use

Instructor: Nancy Folbre

Topics

  1. Problems and Conceptual Issues regarding Accounting for Unpaid Work
  2. Types of Care
  3. Features of Time Use Surveys
  4. Comparability Issue
  5. Supervisory Care and Simultaneous Activities 

This session refers to time use surveys (TUS) and the ways to improve the methodology used in their collection. There are several issues that need to be considered when using TUS. Three problems with existing TUS: (1) Underestimation of temporal constraints imposed by dependent care, not only the time used but how it restricts paid employment. (2) Inconsistencies of direct care time across surveys and survey designs (3) International harmonization: Surveys need to be more cost effective and accommodate national differences. More gender voices are needed in national statistical offices and UN divisions. There are also global and regional comparability issues as TUS differ in: definition of simultaneous activities; ages to classify as children; different definition of dependents; micro and meta data is not available. NF discussed the example of Mexico and Ecuador’s TUS. 

Main Reading

Folbre, Nancy. “Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy.” Journal of Human Development 7, no. 2 (2006): 183-199. 

Supplementary Readings

Chen, Xinxin, John Giles, Yafeng Wang, and Yaohui Zhao. "Gender patterns of eldercare in China." Feminist Economics 24, no. 2 (2018): 54-76.

Mugehera, Leah, and Amber Parkes. "Unlocking Sustainable Development in Africa by Addressing Unpaid Care and Domestic Work." (2020) 

TOP